New tool provides recovery level transparency…

WRAP unveils new tool to provide details of C&D waste recovery levels.

Waste management contractors and MRF operators working in the construction industry can now offer their clients complete transparency on the recovery rates achieved on their behalf, thanks to an innovative measurement tool being launched by WRAP (Waste & Resources Action Programme).

The freely available Site Specific Waste Analysis Tool (SSWAT) allows waste contractors to track each consignment of construction, demolition and excavation waste processed at their facilities, reporting exactly how – and in what quantities – the materials have been recovered. Historically, it has been rare for operators to offer customer-specific recycling information of this type, relying instead on monthly or quarterly figures based on total throughput.

Further information can be found here.

High Reach, High Profile…

The new Demolition Digest blog post on high reach guidance is now live.

Our latest contribution to Construction Equipment’s superb blog area is now live and available to read.

Following a lively recent debate about the apparent reluctance of some US demolition contractors to adopt the use of high reach demolition excavators, we were somewhat surprised (but nonetheless proud) that the US’ National Demolition Association was about to adopt an Americanized version of the NFDC’s High Reach Guidance Notes on which we were a co-author.

To find out more, and to possibly secure yourself a copy of that original – and still unique – guidance, please visit the Demolition Digest.

DemoBoys.com goes live…

We’ve just received notice that the new DemoBoys website is now LIVE!

We reported last week that the demolition business was about to get a fashion makeoever, thanks to the good people of DemoBoys and their new line of t-shirts. Well, after an extraordinary level of response both here in Europe and in the company’s native US, their website has just gone live.

Please go take a look (and keep checking back – I have it on pretty good authority that the company has some exciting new products planned for its Fall/Winter collection)

Coleman & Co lands New Street contract…

Birmingham-based Coleman & Co awarded New Street station contract.

A £2.7m contract to demolish part of a multi-storey car park as part of the redevelopment of Birmingham’s New Street station has been won, appropriately, by Birmingham-based Coleman & Co.

According to Transport Briefing, the company beat five other shortlisted firms to win the job, which involves demolition of a reinforced concrete car park and removing mechanical and electrical components along with non-structural elements such as lifts, escalators and offices.

Read the full story here.

Demolition contractor hit by cyber crime…

California demolition company falls victim to $447,000 cyber crime.

The Washington Post reports that California-based Ferma Corp. was the victim of a $447,000 cyber crime in mid-July. Computer crooks stole the money by initiating a large batch of transfers from Ferma’s online bank account to 39 “money mules,” willing or unwitting accomplices who typically are ensnared via job search Web sites into bogus work-at-home schemes.

Ferma President Roy Ferrari said he learned of the fraud not from his bank but from a financial institution at which several of the mules had recently opened accounts.

Read the full story here.

We’ve been banned…!

Without warning, Demolition News has been banned from demolitionforum.com

Forum: A public meeting place for open discussion; A medium for open discussion or voicing of ideas, such as a newspaper, a radio or television program, or a website.

I love America. I love its literature and its culture; its pride and patriotism. I love the fact that it can hold a World Series of Baseball and not invite the rest of the world. I love the fact that you can get a burger constructed almost entirely from cholesterol anytime, day or night, and that you can probably sue someone on the rare occasions that you can’t.

But most of all, I love the fact that Americans see freedom of speech and freedom of expression not so much as a constitutional right but as an item they have on temporary loan and must, therefore, use to its full potential each and every day. (This, after all, is a country where Charlie Sheen can demand a meeting with the President because he’s not entirely convinced by official explanations over the 9/11 attacks).

So I was saddened and more than a little disappointed when we received an email from the US-based demolitionforum.com to say that we have been effectively banned from their discussion area.

Rather than dwell upon the matter, I would like to take this opportunity merely to lay before you the email that we received and the one that we sent in response, purely to show our readers (and theirs) precisely why our comments have ceased without warning:

Hi Mark,

At this time, we have decided to discontinue our relationship with Demolition News as a member and contributor to Demolition Forum. Although this decision was not easy, we have come to this conclusion based on your site’s recent coverage of the US demolition market and your newest venture with Construction Equipment magazine, again cover [sic] the US market, we feel that Demolition News has become a competing site and that it is in our best interest that we sever ties. You will still have access to reading the forum, you just will not be able to post or relpy [sic].

We thank you for your insight and possibly look forward to working again in the future.

Thank you,

James Seligman
President
JMCA Media, Inc.

Hi James,

I am, of course, disappointed at your decision, and I do wonder if it is based purely upon my perceived competitiveness, or whether the nature of some of my recent posts have merely ruffled the wrong feathers.

Either way, I totally respect and understand your decision and wish you (and your members) well in the future.

Kind Regards
Mark

“Please accept my resignation. I don’t care to belong to any club that will have me as a member”.
Groucho Marx – 1959

It would be a terrible shame if someone posted a link to this article on demolitionforum, wouldn’t it…?

Baltimore debacle continues…

Baltimore Development Corp terminates demolition contract awarded controversially.

Baltimore Development Corp BDC) has terminated a $1.5 million demolition contract that was to clear the way for a $112 million downtown redevelopment project called CityScape.

BDC President M.J. “Jay” Brodie said his agency awarded the demolition contract to Berg Corp. under a controversial policy it has decided to abandon. Instead of demolishing the properties, the city will sell the land to CityScape’s developers as is, with its buildings intact.

Read the ongoing story here.

Building collapse prompts demolition rethink…

Demolition in Amsterdam, New York prioritised following collapse of neglected building.

Last winter, the city of Amsterdam in Montgomery County, New York began a collaboration with the County’s demolition/asbestos abatement team and razed seven of the over 50 city-owned properties that were placed on the demolition list.

But, following an unscheduled collapse yesterday of a building that had been slated for demolition, city officials were forced to give the programme greater focus, as The Recorder reports.

Bid spread shocker…NOT!

Fast and cheap or slow and expensive? Yellowstone, you decide.

Yellowstone County Commissioners opened bids last week to demolish the DHL building on the space that will soon provide parking for Yellowstone County employees. The bids were surprising (though possibly not to regular readers of Demolition News) in their range from a high of $129,501 to a low of $39,748.

According to the Laurel Outlook article, the low bid was submitted by H. L. Ostermiller Construction, who committed to having the project demolition completed in 30 days. The high bid was received from C & S Construction, Billings, who committed to a 60-day completion date. Other bids were from Winkler Contractors, Roundup, for $57,495, 30 days; and Matriarch Construction, Laurel, $91,450, 45 days.

Now can I ask an idiot question here?

If speedy completion of a demolition project is a factor, more manpower and machinery is normally employed to get that job done more quickly, all of which costs money, right? So how is the lowest bid also the one with the shortest proposed contract duration?

Answers on a postcard (or in the comments area below) please.

High Reach looks good on paper…

Grant McKay Demolition uses Link Belt high reach on paper mill demolition.

Utah-based Grant McKay Demolition has used a 34 metre reach Link Belt LX 700 UHD excavator equipped with an Atlas Copco CC 3300 combi cutter attachment to tackle the demolition of a former paper mill in the Houston suburb of Sheldon, the company’s first foray into the state of Texas.

According to this Equipment Today report, the project involved the demolition of a bulding that covered an area of some 150,000 square metres, together with the deconstruction of a 30 metre high power plant.

Read the full story and see more photos here.