<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Demolition News &#187; Photos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.demolitionnews.com/category/photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.demolitionnews.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:57:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Another Rusch monster&#8230;continued</title>
		<link>http://www.demolitionnews.com/2009/08/20/another-rusch-monstercontinued/</link>
		<comments>http://www.demolitionnews.com/2009/08/20/another-rusch-monstercontinued/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high reach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil rig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rusch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.demolitionnews.com/?p=2475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More photos have just become available of the new Rusch Triple 34-25 in Norway.
We would never suggest that you, our loyal readers, are predictable.   But there are two things guaranteed to be popular here on Demolition News: video of demolition gone bad; and video and photos of big machines.
Thankfully, unless our news sources [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>More photos have just become available of the new Rusch Triple 34-25 in Norway.</strong></p>
<p>We would never suggest that you, our loyal readers, are predictable.   But there are two things guaranteed to be popular here on Demolition News: video of demolition gone bad; and video and photos of big machines.</p>
<p>Thankfully, unless our news sources have betrayed us, there&#8217;s currently no new footage of demolition gone awry so instead here&#8217;s some more details on the Rusch Triple 34-25 that is currently undergoing assembly and testing in Norway before it starts work eating decommissioned oil rigs for breakfast.</p>
<p>In addition, Rusch&#8217; Ruud Schreijer has very kindly provided us with a diagram showing the working range of the latest beast to roll out of his company&#8217;s gates.</p>
<div id="attachment_2476" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 274px"><a href="http://www.demolitionnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/af-decom-norwegen-218.jpg"><img src="http://www.demolitionnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/af-decom-norwegen-218-264x300.jpg" alt="Genesis\&#039; Dan Jacobson checks over the modified attachment" title="af-decom-norwegen-218" width="264" height="300" class="size-medium wp-image-2476" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Genesis' Dan Jacobson checks over the modified attachment</p></div>
<div id="attachment_2477" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.demolitionnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/img_3589.jpg"><img src="http://www.demolitionnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/img_3589-300x216.jpg" alt="Getting ready to eat oil rigs" title="img_3589" width="300" height="216" class="size-medium wp-image-2477" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Getting ready to eat oil rigs</p></div>
<p><a href='http://www.demolitionnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/triple-34-25-diagr-20081009.pdf'>Working Range Diagram</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.demolitionnews.com/2009/08/20/another-rusch-monstercontinued/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Rusch monster&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.demolitionnews.com/2009/08/19/another-rusch-monster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.demolitionnews.com/2009/08/19/another-rusch-monster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high reach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil rig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rusch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.demolitionnews.com/?p=2466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New photo showing the 34-25 high reach excavator from Dutch modifier Rusch.
When your best-known machine has a working height of 90 metres, anything else is going to look pretty small by comparison.   But don&#8217;t be fooled.   The machine in the photo (left) might only reach a lowly 34 metres, but it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>New photo showing the 34-25 high reach excavator from Dutch modifier Rusch.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.demolitionnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/img_3284.jpg"><img src="http://www.demolitionnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/img_3284-200x300.jpg" alt="" title="img_3284" width="200" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2469" /></a>When your best-known machine has a working height of 90 metres, anything else is going to look pretty small by comparison.   But don&#8217;t be fooled.   The machine in the photo (left) might only reach a lowly 34 metres, but it can wield a 25 tonne too at that height (and no, there isn&#8217;t a decimal point missing there.   It really <strong>DOES </strong>say 25 tonnes!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.demolitionnews.com/2009/08/19/another-rusch-monster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Genesis unveils new attachment&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.demolitionnews.com/2009/08/19/genesis-unveils-new-attachment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.demolitionnews.com/2009/08/19/genesis-unveils-new-attachment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 08:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genesis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.demolitionnews.com/?p=2459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new GDR-200 is the latest attachment to join the swelling Genesis product range.
Genesis has unveiled the GDR-200, a new processing attachment designed for excavators in the 20 tonne operating weight class.
The GDR-200 delivers 104 tonnes of crushing force at the tip, an 813 mm jaw depth, a jaw opening of 890 mm, and a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The new GDR-200 is the latest attachment to join the swelling Genesis product range.</strong></p>
<p><img alt="" src="http://www.forconstructionpros.com/article/photos/1250603223214_GDR_200.jpg" class="alignleft" width="300" height="448" />Genesis has unveiled the GDR-200, a new processing attachment designed for excavators in the 20 tonne operating weight class.</p>
<p>The GDR-200 delivers 104 tonnes of crushing force at the tip, an 813 mm jaw depth, a jaw opening of 890 mm, and a quick seven second cycle time.  Genesis says this is the largest jaw they&#8217;ve ever offered  on a tool for a 20-tonne class machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.demolitionnews.com/2009/08/19/genesis-unveils-new-attachment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Excavator cab vs concrete beam&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.demolitionnews.com/2009/08/13/excavator-cab-vs-concrete-beam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.demolitionnews.com/2009/08/13/excavator-cab-vs-concrete-beam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demolition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excavator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.demolitionnews.com/?p=2378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exclusive photos showing Volvo excavator cab hit by 10 tonne concrete beam.
There are times when words just aren&#8217;t enough.   So, aside from saying that the operator thankfully escaped with just a few cuts caused by the imploding windscreen, here&#8217;s what happens when a 10 tonne concrete beam lands on an excavator cab:


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Exclusive photos showing Volvo excavator cab hit by 10 tonne concrete beam.</strong></p>
<p>There are times when words just aren&#8217;t enough.   So, aside from saying that the operator thankfully escaped with just a few cuts caused by the imploding windscreen, here&#8217;s what happens when a 10 tonne concrete beam lands on an excavator cab:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.demolitionnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/volvo-1.jpg"><img src="http://www.demolitionnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/volvo-1-300x202.jpg" alt="" title="volvo-1" width="300" height="202" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2379" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.demolitionnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/volvo-2.jpg"><img src="http://www.demolitionnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/volvo-2-300x202.jpg" alt="" title="volvo-2" width="300" height="202" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2380" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.demolitionnews.com/2009/08/13/excavator-cab-vs-concrete-beam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When crushers collide&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.demolitionnews.com/2009/08/06/when-crushers-collide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.demolitionnews.com/2009/08/06/when-crushers-collide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demolition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demolitionnews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dig a crusher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powerscreen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.demolitionnews.com/?p=2273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What happens when you use one crusher as a battering ram on another.
“&#8230;In the red corner, weighing in at an impressive 40 tonnes, the Powerscreen WARRIOR.   And in the blue corner, weighing a measly 3.5 tonnes, the Dig A Crusher 900 crusher bucket&#8230;”
Word reaches us that a group of vandals broke into a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What happens when you use one crusher as a battering ram on another.</strong></p>
<p>“&#8230;In the red corner, weighing in at an impressive 40 tonnes, the Powerscreen WARRIOR.   And in the blue corner, weighing a measly 3.5 tonnes, the Dig A Crusher 900 crusher bucket&#8230;”</p>
<p>Word reaches us that a group of vandals broke into a Thames Valley C&#038;D recycling site recently and decided to see which of the two crushers were the toughest: the old heavyweight; or the up and coming lightweight contender.   Setting aside the Queensberry Rules, they used the Dig A Crusher as a battering ram against its much larger opponent.</p>
<p>On paper, this had all the makings of the most one-sided fight since Frank Bruno repeatedly head-butted Mike Tyson’s boxing gloves.   </p>
<p>But anyone that is familiar with the story of David and Goliath or who has seen the movie <em>300</em> should know that size doesn’t always matter in these circumstances, as the following photo clearly illustrates.</p>
<div id="attachment_2274" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.demolitionnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/warrior.jpg"><img src="http://www.demolitionnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/warrior-300x194.jpg" alt="Beaten and Bowed" title="warrior" width="300" height="194" class="size-medium wp-image-2274" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Beaten and Bowed</p></div>
<p>The aptly-named Warrior lies beaten, reduced to so much mangled metal while the Dig A Crusher&#8230;.<br />
&#8230;well the Dig A Crusher isn’t in the photo because it’s actually back at work having required no repair or maintenance work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.demolitionnews.com/2009/08/06/when-crushers-collide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Collapsed Shanghai building being demolished&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.demolitionnews.com/2009/08/06/collapsed-shanghai-building-being-demolished/</link>
		<comments>http://www.demolitionnews.com/2009/08/06/collapsed-shanghai-building-being-demolished/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 09:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demolition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demolitionnews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shanghai]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.demolitionnews.com/?p=2271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Shanghai tower block that collapsed recently is now being demolished.
Following a lead from Safedem managing director William Sinclair, we recently reported on the collapse of a 13-storey tower block in the Minhang District of Shanghai in which the entire structure simply laid down, almost entirely intact.
Well, if that wasn&#8217;t surreal enough, the demolition of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Shanghai tower block that collapsed recently is now being demolished.</strong></p>
<p>Following a lead from Safedem managing director William Sinclair, we recently reported on the collapse of a 13-storey tower block in <a href="http://www.demolitionnews.com/2009/07/22/demolition-made-easy-chinese-style/">the Minhang District of Shanghai</a> in which the entire structure simply laid down, almost entirely intact.</p>
<p>Well, if that wasn&#8217;t surreal enough, the demolition of the fallen structure has now begun, giving rise to some very unusual-looking photographs.</p>
<p><img alt="" src="http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/images/attachement/jpg/site1/20090806/0013729e48090be4d13712.jpg" class="alignleft" width="450" height="300" /></p>
<p><img alt="" src="http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/images/attachement/jpg/site1/20090806/0013729e48090be4d0120f.jpg" class="alignleft" width="450" height="295" /></p>
<p>Click <a href="http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2009-08/06/content_8536436.htm">here </a>for more photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.demolitionnews.com/2009/08/06/collapsed-shanghai-building-being-demolished/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
